HEADLESS CMS - ASTRO - MIGRATIONS
We help Perth businesses decide whether a headless CMS is the right move, then build fast websites with cleaner content workflows, safer migrations, and room to grow.
Headless is useful when your site needs stronger performance, reusable content, cleaner publishing rules, or a front end that is not limited by a traditional theme.
It is not always the best answer. If WordPress, Shopify, or a simpler CMS will be easier for your team to run, we will recommend that instead.
When headless is right, we can plan Astro or static architecture, WordPress-to-headless migration, Payload CMS where it fits, redirects, metadata preservation, image handling, editorial workflow, and launch QA.
Headless is worth considering when content, speed, security, and publishing control all matter enough to justify a more deliberate setup.
Astro and static frontends can make content-heavy pages load quickly, especially when visitors are browsing on mobile.
Editors can work inside a structured CMS while the public website stays fast, stable, and harder to break accidentally.
Content export, URL mapping, metadata preservation, image handling, redirects, editorial workflow, and launch QA are planned before the move.
A headless setup can support future redesigns, larger content libraries, reusable content blocks, and multi-channel publishing more easily.
The right platform depends on how your team publishes, how complex the content is, and how much technical ownership the site needs.
A practical choice when your team values familiar editing, plugin support, and a simpler all-in-one workflow.
Best when you need stronger performance, content reuse, cleaner governance, and front-end freedom.
A strong fit for fast marketing sites, content hubs, and pages that should load quickly without a heavy database-driven front end.
Often the better path when products, checkout, inventory, and store operations are the main problem.
Use headless when your website needs speed, publishing control, and a safer way to grow content without fighting a theme.
A headless website separates the content system from the public front end. That can make the website faster and more flexible, but only if the publishing workflow is planned properly.
We help you compare WordPress vs headless CMS, Astro vs WordPress, and ecommerce platform options before committing to a build.
The best CMS is the one your team can use confidently while still giving customers a fast, reliable website.
Choose this when content reuse, speed, governance, and front-end flexibility have become real business requirements.
$4,500 Starting CurrentChoose this when the project also includes broader migration, integration, performance repair, or custom build scope.
$2,500 Starting Go to ->Choose this when Shopify, products, checkout, inventory, and ecommerce operations are the real centre of the project.
$3,000 Starting Go to ->If your team mainly needs familiar editing, basic pages, and simple publishing, a cleaner WordPress setup may be a better investment than headless.
If you need reusable content, stronger performance, complex service libraries, or publishing rules across many page types, headless can be worth the extra planning.
Avoid headless if the site is small, the team rarely publishes, the budget is tight, or nobody wants responsibility for a more structured CMS workflow.
Before moving from WordPress or another CMS, plan content export, URL mapping, metadata preservation, image handling, redirects, editorial workflow, and launch QA.
Read migration guide ->HEADLESS DEVELOPMENT PACKAGES
Headless work combines website development, content planning, migration care, and launch QA. The right budget depends on publishing complexity, existing content, and how much control your team needs.
From $4,500
A pragmatic first step for businesses that need a faster frontend or cleaner CMS structure without overengineering the stack.
From $7,500
A fuller headless implementation for content-heavy websites that need reusable blocks, governance, and better long-term performance.
From $12,000+
For multi-site estates, higher-risk migrations, or teams that need deeper governance and integration planning.
All prices are in AUD. CMS vendor fees, migration tooling, and multi-site rollout requirements are confirmed during scoping.
Explore project concepts that show speed and content control, with a technical foundation built for modern Perth businesses.
A boutique accommodation booking site. Features high-end room showcases, amenity highlights, and a seamless enquiry funnel.
A high-octane fitness brand. Features kinetic typography, aggressive motion design, and a conversion-focused membership funnel.
Perth's loudest boba brand. A high-voltage, sticker-aesthetic website featuring a custom menu builder and vibrant motion design.
A high-trust lead generation site for local tradies. Features instant quote forms, service area mapping, and mobile-first functional design.
A headless CMS keeps content in a separate editing system while the public website is built separately. That can give you faster pages, cleaner content reuse, and more front-end flexibility.
Not always. WordPress is often better when your team values familiar editing and the site is not technically complex. Headless is better when speed, content structure, reuse, and front-end control matter enough to justify the extra planning.
Yes. We can plan content export, URL mapping, metadata preservation, image handling, redirects, editorial workflow, and launch QA so the move is controlled.
Yes. Astro is a strong fit for fast marketing sites, hospitality websites, content hubs, and service pages where performance matters and heavy app behaviour is not needed.
Payload can be a good option when a project needs a flexible content model and the team is comfortable with a more custom CMS setup. We only recommend it when it fits the editing and maintenance needs.
Headless can be overkill for small sites, low-change businesses, tight budgets, or teams that simply want a familiar editor and minimal technical ownership.
No. A well-planned headless CMS lets your team update approved content fields. You usually need development help only for new templates, new features, or larger layout changes.
