Web Development Case Study

How Vegan Hacks Made Plant-Based Cooking Easier With a Tool-Driven Recipe Platform

Amplify Creative Lab designed and built Vegan Hacks as a practical plant-based cooking platform that pairs a growing recipe and guide library with interactive kitchen tools, so readers get real help in the kitchen instead of another static recipe blog.

Vegan Hacks website homepage with vibrant plant-based recipe visuals and a bold, content-first layout

Project Snapshot

What Vegan Hacks gained from the website

Web Development Case Study Remote

Vegan Hacks launched as a genuinely useful cooking companion rather than a content dump. The platform now publishes recipes, guides, and lifestyle content in two languages, and its interactive tools give readers reasons to come back that a template recipe site can never offer.

Visit the client site

Platform
Bilingual plant-based recipe and cooking-tools website
Stack
Astro, MDX, React islands, Supabase, Resend, Netlify, and a custom design system
Tools
Five interactive React islands: substitutions finder, ingredient converter, recipe scaler with shopping list, meal helper, and nutrition playground
Standout
Web-app functionality inside a static site, with English and Italian built into the content model

The problem Vegan Hacks needed to solve

Plant-based cooking content is one of the most crowded spaces online, and most of it looks identical: template blogs, thin listicles, and recipe pages buried under ads. Vegan Hacks needed to stand out by being more useful, not just better looking. That meant a platform that could answer the practical questions vegan cooks actually have — what can I substitute, how do I scale this, what should I cook tonight — while staying fast, simple, and easy to browse in both English and Italian.

How we shaped the website for Vegan Hacks

The site was planned as a set of cooking tools wrapped in an editorial platform, not a blog with extras. The brand direction stayed warm and unfussy — fresh ingredients, simple language, no preachiness — matching the promise of simple plant-based meals with fresh, everyday ingredients. The architecture separates recipes, guides, and tools into clear pathways, with bilingual content built in from the start rather than bolted on, and a fast static foundation that keeps interactive features light instead of turning the site into a heavy app.

What Was Delivered

Website delivered for Vegan Hacks

  • Custom website design and front-end build for a practical plant-based cooking brand
  • Structured recipe and guide templates with editorial layouts and clear browse pathways
  • Five interactive kitchen tools built as React islands: substitutions finder, ingredient converter, recipe scaler with shopping list generator, meal helper, and per-recipe nutrition playground
  • Recipe rating and review system backed by Supabase, with transactional email through Resend
  • Static site search via Pagefind, plus cooking mode and generated recipe audio
  • Random recipe discovery flow for readers who don't know what to cook
  • Bilingual English and Italian content architecture with newsletter capture

What Changed

What changed for Vegan Hacks after delivery

  • A cooking platform that is materially more useful than a static recipe library
  • Interactive tools that answer real kitchen questions instead of just presenting content
  • A bilingual structure that serves English and Italian audiences from one system
  • A clear separation of recipes, guides, and tools that keeps browsing simple as the library grows
  • A fast, scalable editorial base for long-term organic growth

Rollout Context

Web application development: building five kitchen tools into a static site

Vegan Hacks started from a simple observation: the internet does not need another vegan recipe blog, but vegan cooks do need better help in the kitchen.

Plant-based recipes are one of the most saturated content categories online. Competing on volume is a losing game — there will always be a site with more recipes, more backlinks and a decade’s head start. So the platform was built to compete on usefulness instead, which is a much narrower and more winnable position. The site is a set of working tools that happens to publish recipes, rather than a recipe archive with a few widgets attached.

That distinction drove the entire technical approach, and it is the part worth explaining.

The problem with “just add a plugin”

The obvious way to add a substitutions lookup or a recipe scaler to a food site is to install something. On WordPress that means a plugin; on most hosted platforms it means an embed.

Both approaches carry the same cost. The tool arrives as a black box, loads its own JavaScript framework, renders in an iframe or a shortcode you don’t control, styles itself however it likes, and often phones home. Add four of them and the site becomes slow, visually incoherent, and dependent on four separate vendors who can change their pricing or disappear.

The alternative is to build the tools yourself, and the objection is always the same: that means building an app, and an app is slow and expensive to maintain.

That objection is out of date. This site is fully static — every page is pre-built HTML — and the interactive tools are loaded as islands: small, self-contained React components that hydrate only on the pages that actually use them. A reader browsing a guide downloads no tool code at all. A reader who opens the ingredient converter downloads the converter, and nothing else.

You get application behaviour where it is genuinely needed, and a plain fast static page everywhere else.

The five tools

Each one exists because it answers a question that sends readers away from a recipe site to go and search separately.

  • Substitutions finder. The most common vegan cooking question there is: what do I use instead of eggs, butter, honey, gelatine, fish sauce? It runs off a structured substitutions dataset rather than a wall of prose, so an answer is a lookup rather than a scroll.
  • Ingredient converter. Cups to grams, millilitres to ounces, and the ingredient-specific conversions that generic converters get wrong — a cup of flour and a cup of oil do not weigh the same, and a converter that treats them identically is worse than none.
  • Recipe scaler with shopping list. Scales a recipe to a different number of servings and produces a consolidated shopping list from the result. This is the largest of the tools, and the one that most clearly crosses from content into software.
  • Meal helper. Recommends what to cook based on constraints — what you have, what you feel like, how much time there is — for the reader who does not have a specific dish in mind.
  • Nutrition playground. Sits on the recipe page itself and lets readers toggle ingredients on and off, change servings and see nutrition update live, rather than reading one fixed table calculated for a serving size they are not making.

All five are written as React islands in the same codebase, sharing the same design tokens as the rest of the site. They look like part of the platform because they are part of the platform.

Where a static site needed a real backend

Two features could not be static, and it is worth being precise about how they were handled rather than pretending everything runs on pre-built HTML.

Recipe ratings and reviews need to persist across visitors, so they run through a server endpoint backed by Supabase. Submissions are validated server-side, and a review notification is sent through Resend. The endpoint is explicitly marked non-prerendered — it is the only part of the site that runs on request.

Site search went the other way. Rather than adding a hosted search service with a monthly cost and an external dependency, search is generated at build time with Pagefind, which indexes the built site and serves results from static files. Search works with no server, no API key and no per-query cost.

That split is the actual engineering judgement in this project: use a server only where state genuinely has to be shared between visitors, and solve everything else at build time. Most sites reach for a backend far earlier than they need one.

Bilingual as an architecture decision, not a translation layer

English and Italian were part of the content model from the first commit, not added later with a translation plugin.

Recipes and posts live under locale-scoped directories, routing is locale-aware, and each piece of content carries a translation key that links it to its counterpart. The recipe review system is locale-aware too — a review knows which language version it was left on.

The reason this matters is that retrofitting a second language is one of the most expensive changes you can make to a content site. URL structures have to change, which means redirects; every internal link has to become locale-aware; and search engines need consistent signals in both directions. Doing it at the start costs a few days. Doing it in year three costs a rebuild.

What this build actually demonstrates

Vegan Hacks is a food site, but the technical pattern is not about food at all.

It is the pattern for any business whose website needs to do something rather than just describe something: a calculator, a configurator, a quoting tool, a booking flow, a portal. The same architecture applies — a fast static site for the content, isolated interactive islands for the functionality, a server only where state must be shared, and build-time solutions wherever they will do the job.

That combination is what makes custom web development worth paying for over a template. A template can present your content. It cannot give your customers a tool that solves their actual problem, and it is the tool that makes people come back.


The result: a plant-based cooking platform that behaves like a kitchen companion rather than an archive. Five interactive tools built into the site rather than bolted onto it, ratings and reviews on a real backend, zero-cost static search, and English and Italian handled properly from the start.

Explore Vegan Hacks or read about our Web Development Perth service.

Web Development Case Study

Want a website that helps your audience instead of just talking at them?

The strongest content platforms are built like products. We plan the architecture, UX, and interactive features together so your site becomes something people use and return to, not another template they scroll past.

Start Project
Keith de Kretser ★★★★★ Google review

I recently used Amplify Creative Lab for my surfboard product photography and couldn't be happier with the experience. From my very first enquiry through to the completion of the project, Jojo and Stefan were an absolute pleasure to work with. They took the time to understand exactly what I wanted and made sure every detail was covered before the shoot. Photographing surfboards is never an easy task, but Jojo and Stefan made the whole process far easier than I expected. They arrived early to set up all of their equipment and were incredibly professional and meticulous with every single photo they took. Their attention to detail and commitment to getting the perfect shot really stood out.

I have just received the finished product photos, and they have exceeded my expectations. The quality is outstanding, and I couldn't be happier with the results.

I highly recommend Jojo and Stefan from Amplify Creative Lab to anyone looking for professional product photography or any other photography services. Their professionalism, attention to detail, and commitment to delivering exceptional results make them a pleasure to work with. Thank you both for an outstanding job! Keith owner B Softboards

Plan Your Next Project

Tell us about your project — food photography, product shoots, website design, or full brand content packages. We respond within 24 hours.
Alternatively use our 60 seconds photography shoot planner or website development planner.